Skip to main content
Help · Review & publish

Reviewing and fixing compliance failures

How to interpret a failed rule check, what evidence to supply, and when to mark a finding as an acceptable variance.

Updated 2026-04-18

Anatomy of a failure

Every compliance check returns one of three states:

  • Pass — green. The rule is satisfied; evidence is linked.
  • Warn — yellow. The rule is satisfied but a boundary case deserves review (e.g. 90th-percentile within 10% of the Action Level).
  • Fail — red. The rule is not satisfied. Publish is blocked.

Each check includes the clause citation, the evidence reviewed, and a one-click “fix” button when the fix is deterministic.

When fail is correct

Sometimes a fail is the right answer and you should disclose a violation rather than override the check. Example: your 2025 nitrate MCL violation should produce a fail against § 141.153(f); the fix is to include the violation disclosure section, not to override the check.

When fail is wrong

Occasionally the agent flags a fail based on an incorrect data extraction. Example: a lab qualifier misparsed as a detection, when it was actually “below reporting limit.” Fix the underlying data in the Evidence panel; the check re-runs automatically.

Overriding a check

There is no “override” button. If a fail is blocking publish, either:

  1. Fix the underlying data (most common), or
  2. Contact hello@1water.ai if you believe the check itself is incorrect. We’ll triage within one business day and either ship a fix or clarify why the check is right.
Your 2026 CCR is due July 1

Still need help? Write us.

60-day free trial. No credit card. Your trial becomes your first published CCR.

Agent-native · SOC 2 roadmap · 5-year audit trail